A conversation with Amar Galla on the illicit trafficking of cultural property in India
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56d9a/56d9aa5144283361e191427bbea065edda02e1c7" alt=""
Compliance is only part of the implementation. It is hard to monitor in a large country. Far more important is advocacy and awareness raising. Not just in the major cities, but most importantly at the state and local government levels.
India has the requisite compliance measures to minimise illicit traffic in cultural property. However, the scope of cultural property needs to be broadened from the predominance of focus on ‘antiquities’ as understood from a bygone era. For instance, industrial and craft heritage is often looted in India for export.
Cultural mapping needs to be better understood and used as a tool for safeguarding heritage of all kinds. Mapping should lead to strategic planning.
Prevention of illicit traffic of all kinds is multilateral. It is rarely bilateral. Borders are porous. In this context regional collaborations are critical.
Greater collaboration is needed with Interpol, WCO, ICOM and UNESCO through appropriate capacity building. This should include not only the ability to inventorise but also communicate.You can read the full interview at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/newdelhi/about-this-office/single-view/news/an_insight_into_illicit_trafficking_of_cultural_property_in/
Similar content
posted on
19 Jul 2017
posted on
17 May 2011